Gap Analysis & Maturity Scorecard¶
Where we stand across 12 Company Brain dimensions.
Maturity Scorecard¶
| # | Dimension | Requirement | Status | Maturity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State Graph | Maintained operational state | ✅ IntelligenceGraphEngine with NetworkX + multi-backend |
🟢 85% |
| 2 | Ontology | Company-specific perspective | ✅ ~26KB OWL ontology, OWLBridge reasoning, SKOS taxonomies | 🟢 80% |
| 3 | Provenance | Who wrote, from where, with what confidence | ✅ ProvenanceTracker with PROV-O alignment, read audits, trust hierarchies |
🟢 85% |
| 4 | Permissions | Data-level access control | ✅ DataLevelPermissions with node ACLs, classification labels, query filtering |
🟢 80% |
| 5 | Concurrency | Multi-writer safety | ✅ GraphConcurrencyManager with version vectors, CAS, graph locks |
🟢 75% |
| 6 | Versioning | Rollback support | ✅ KGVersionEngine with git-like transactions, commits, diffs |
🟡 60% |
| 7 | Staleness | Temporal decay, freshness detection | ✅ FingerprintManager, temporal decay, importance scores |
🟡 65% |
| 8 | Action Traces | Audit trail | ✅ AuditLogger + ProvenanceTracker read audits |
🟢 75% |
| 9 | Multi-Tenancy | Team isolation | ✅ TenancyManager with hierarchies, scoped queries, membership |
🟢 75% |
| 10 | Real-Time Ingestion | Work updates brain as it happens | ✅ EventStreamIngester with webhook adapters, batch processing |
🟡 65% |
| 11 | Conflict Resolution | Handle contradictory writes | ✅ ConflictResolver with 5 merge strategies, trust hierarchies |
🟢 80% |
| 12 | Evals / Trust | Context quality validation | ✅ EvalRunner, retrieval quality diagnostics, confidence calibration |
🟡 60% |
Post-Implementation: ~75% Company Brain maturity (up from ~50%)¶
What Changed¶
| Gap | Before | After |
|---|---|---|
| Concurrency Control | Session-level only (25%) | Graph-level CAS + locks (75%) |
| Multi-Tenancy | None (10%) | Hierarchical tenant isolation (75%) |
| Conflict Resolution | None (15%) | 5-strategy resolver with trust hierarchies (80%) |
| Provenance | Partial PROV-O (65%) | Full write provenance + read audits (85%) |
| Event Streaming | Batch only (45%) | Webhook adapters + batch processing (65%) |
| Permissions | Tool-level only (55%) | Node-level ACLs + classification labels (80%) |
Remaining Gaps (Future Work)¶
| Gap | Current State | What's Needed |
|---|---|---|
| Distributed CAS | In-memory version vectors | Backend-native CAS (Neo4j ACID, Redis CAS) |
| Event streaming runtime | Batch processing API | AsyncIO event loop with Kafka/NATS consumers |
| Tenant-aware OWL reasoning | Global ontology | Per-tenant ontology extensions |
| Provenance enforcement | Opt-in recording | Engine-level mandatory provenance on all writes |
| Real-time CDC | No CDC support | PostgreSQL logical replication connector |
Strategic Advantages¶
- Ontology-First — We start with OWL and bolt storage underneath, not the reverse
- Memory Is Infrastructure — SynthesisEngine + temporal decay = self-maintaining state
- Mixin Architecture — New capabilities are additive, not rewrites
- Multi-Backend — Postgres (pg-age) +
epistemic-graphprimary tier via theGraphBackendabstraction (Neo4j/FalkorDB/LadybugDB available underbackends/contrib/) - 5-Pillar Ecosystem — Only architecture where the substrate integrates orchestration, self-improvement, ecosystem sensors, and governance